2017 CCR
Consumer Confidence Report
2017 Consumer
Confidence Report
Water System Name:
Best Road MWC 350.0823.002-.003 Report Date: 6/12/2018
We test the drinking
water quality for many constituents as required by state and federal
regulations. This report shows the results of our monitoring for the period of
January 1 - December 31, 2017 and may include earlier monitoring data.
Este informe contiene información muy importante
sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo ó hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.
Type of water
source(s) in use: Groundwater
Name &general location of source(s): Well
#1 and #2 are located on John Smith Road; approximately 1 mile from Fairview Road.
Drinking Water Source Assessment information:
See attached; dated August, 2002 (Well #1 & #2
Time and place of regularly scheduled board
meetings for public participation: Monthly meetings are the 2nd Thursday of every
month at 7 pm. See the website for more information (www.brmwc.com)
For more information,
contact: Julian Rogers Phone:
(925) 437.8831
The sources of
drinking water (both tap water and
bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and
wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it
dissolves naturally-occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive
material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or
from human activity.
Contaminants that may be present in source water
include:
·
Microbial
contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage
treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.
·
Inorganic
contaminants, such as salts and metals,that can be naturally-occurring or
result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater
discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or
farming.
·
Pesticides
and herbicides, that may come from a variety of sources such as
agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses.
·
Organic
chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals,
that are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can
also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural application,
and septic systems.
·
Radioactive
contaminants, that can be naturally-occurring or be the result of oil and
gas production and mining activities.
In
order
to ensure that tap water is safe to
drink, the U.S. EPA and the State Water
Resources Control Board (State Board) prescribe regulations that limit the
amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. State
Board regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that
provide the same protection for public health.
Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
and 6 list all of the drinking water contaminants
that were detected during the most recent sampling for the constituent. The presence of these contaminants in the water
does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. The State
Board allows us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year
because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some
of the data, though representative of the water quality, are more than one year
old.Any violation of an AL, MCL, MRDL, or TT is asterisked. Additional
information regarding the violation is provided later in this report.
Additional
General Information on Drinking Water
Drinking
water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least
small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not
necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information about
contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S.
EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791).
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants
in drinking water than the general population. Immuno- compromised persons such
as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone
organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some
elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people
should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. U.S.
EPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen
the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and
other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
(1-800-426-4791).
Lead-Specific Language for Community Water
Systems: If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems,
especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is
primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home
plumbing. Best Road Mutual Water Company is responsible for providing high
quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in
plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you
can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30
seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. [Optional: If
you do so, you may wish to collect the flushed water and reuse it for another
beneficial purpose, such as watering plants.] If you are concerned about lead
in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in
drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is
available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4701) or at http://www.epa.gov/lead.
Summary Information for Federal Revised Total
Coliform Rule Level 1 and Level 2 Assessment Requirements
Level
1 or Level 2 Assessment Requirement not Due to an E. coli MCL Violation
Coliforms are bacteria that are naturally present
in the environment and are used as an indicator that other, potentially
harmful, waterborne pathogens may be present or that a potential pathway exists
through which contamination may enter the drinking water distribution system.
When this occurs, we are required to conduct assessment(s) to identify problems
and to correct any problems that were found during these assessments.
During the past year there were no Level 1
assessments required. During the past year there were no Level 2 assessments
required.
Level
2 Assessment Requirement Due to an E.
coli MCL Violation
E. coli are
bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human
or animal wastes. Human pathogens in these wastes can cause short-term effects,
such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symptoms. They may pose a
greater health risk for infants, young children, the elderly, and people with
severely-compromised immune systems. When this occurs, we are required to
conduct assessment(s) identify problems and to correct any problems that were
found during these assessments.
During the past year there were no Level 2
assessments due to E. coli.
Drinking Water Source Assessment
Water System
BEST
ROAD MWC
San Benito County
Water Source
WELL
01
Assessment Date
August, 2002
Assessment Completed By
CDPH Monterey
District
California
Department of Public Health Drinking Water Field Operations Branch CDPH
Monterey District
District Name CDPH Monterey District
District No. 05
County
San Benito
System Name
BEST ROAD MWC
System No. 3500823
Source
Name
WELL
02 Source No. 003
PS Code
3500823-003
Completed by
CDPH Monterey District
Date August, 2002
According to CDPH records, this Source is Groundwater. This Assessment
was done using the Default Groundwater System Method.
A source water assessment was conducted for the WELL 02
.
of the BEST ROAD MWC water system in August, 2002
The source is considered most
vulnerable to the following activities not associated with any detected
contaminants:
Storm Water Detention
Facilities
Discussion of
Vulnerability
Although outside of the 10 year zone of
influence, there is a landfill located approximately 1 mile from the wells.
This landfill could have long term effects on water quality in the area.
A copy of the
complete assessment may be viewed at:
Best Road MWC
P.O. Box 395 Hollister, CA 95024
You may request a summary of the assessment be
sent to you by contacting:
Bob DeGeorge
President
(831) 636-9782
A source
water assessment was recently completed for this drinking water source. The
assessment identifies the vulnerability of the drinking water supply to
contamination from typical human activities. The assessments are intended to
facilitate and provide the basic information necessary for a local community to
develop a program to protect the drinking water supply.
A summary of
the complete assessment is provided here. For more information, contact the
agency or individual that prepared the assessment (shown in summary). You may
also contact the local Department of Public Health Drinking Water Field
Operations Branch district office (http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/Documents/DDWEM/OriginalDistrictMapCDPH.pdf).
Additional information about
assessments can be found at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Pages/DWSAP.aspx
Terms used in this summary:
Source Water Assessment:
An assessment is an evaluation
of a drinking water source to determine the "possible contaminating
activities"
(PCAs) to which the source is
most vulnerable. The assessment includes: a delineation of protection zones
around the source; an inventory of the types of PCAs within the source
protection zones; and an analysis to determine the PCAs to which the source is most
vulnerable. The information is compiled into a report that includes a map,
calculations, checklists, and a summary of the findings.
Possible Contaminating Activity (PCA): A PCA is a current or
historic human activity that is an actual or potential origin of contamination
for a
drinking water source. PCAs
include activities that use, store, produce or dispose of chemicals that have
the potential to contaminate drinking water supplies. There are 110 types of
PCAs in the California DWSAP program.
PCA Risk Ranking: Each type of PCA is assigned a risk ranking (Very
High, High, Moderate, or Low). The risk ranking is based on the
contaminant(s) typically
associated with that PCA, the likelihood of release from that type of facility
based on historical experience, and the mobility of the contaminant(s).
PCA Inventory: The PCA inventory is a review using local knowledge,
databases, and on-site evaluations to identify the occurrence and
approximate location of PCAs in the source water zones. The inventory
for the basic DWSAP assessments is a presence-absence review. If a type
of PCA occurs in a zone, a
"Yes" is noted in the inventory for that zone, regardless of whether
there is one or many of that type of facility within the zone. If a PCA has
been associated with a contaminant detected in the water supply, a notation is
made in the PCA inventory.
Source Water Zones or Areas:
initial protection areas.
These are areas located around and
typically adjacent to a drinking water source that have been identified as
For groundwater sources, there are typically three concentric circular
zones around a source (Zones A, B5 and B10). The sizes of the
are determined based on
characteristics of the source. PCAs located in the inner Zone A are considered
more of a risk to the water supply than PCAs located in the middle Zone B5.
Similarly, PCAs located in Zone B5 are considered more of a risk than PCAs
located in the outer Zone B10.
For surface water sources, the watershed is defined as the overall
protection area, and as an option, zones are defined closer to the
source. Two types of zones are
typically established. Zone A is the area within and near the surface water
body and its tributaries. Zone B is an area within 2,500 feet of the intake,
not including areas in Zone A. For surface water sources, PCAs located in Zone
A are considered a greater threat than PCAs located in Zone B. PCAs located on
the watershed outside of the zones are considered to be of less risk to the
water supply. If zones have not been defined, PCAs are considered to be of
equal risk regardless of location on the watershed.
Physical Barrier
Effectiveness (PBE): The PBE for a source is an evaluation of the ability of the source and
the surrounding area to prevent the
movement of contaminants into the
source. The PBE is based on the construction and operation features of the
source, and the characteristics of the surrounding area. A source is assigned a
PBE of Low, Moderate or High, where High indicates that the physical barriers
of the source and site are very effective in preventing the movement of
contaminants. By design, typical groundwater sources will have Moderate PBE,
while typical surface water sources will have Low PBE. This is due to the
greater exposure of surface water sources to contamination.
Vulnerability Ranking: The vulnerability ranking is a summary of
the PCAs identified in the assessment prioritized by the risk that they pose to
the water supply. The
prioritization is based on the risk associated with a PCA, the zone in which it
occurs, and the PBE of the source. In the vulnerability ranking, points are
assigned as follows:
The points for each type of PCA
in each zone are totaled to give a vulnerability score, and the PCAs are ranked
in order from the highest score to the lowest score. PCAs associated with
detected contaminants are ranked at the top, regardless of vulnerability score.
By definition, groundwater sources are not considered vulnerable to PCAs with
scores less than 8, and surface water sources are not considered vulnerable to
PCAs with scores less than 11. It should be noted that the vulnerability
ranking scores do not have a direct quantitative value. Rather, the points are
used only to relatively rank the types of PCAs for an individual source.
Note: Some of the summaries do not include a vulnerability ranking. If the
assessment was done on paper and the details were not entered into the
database, the vulnerability ranking is not available here. In addition,
alternate methods of determining vulnerability were allowed in some cases, and
the vulnerability ranking is not in the database.
Vulnerability Summary: The source is considered most vulnerable to
the PCAs with the highest score, and to PCAs associated with detected
contaminants. These PCAs are
noted in the vulnerability summary. Further details or discussion may be
provided in the vulnerability discussion.